This is one side of the spectrum SS is stating here. But this is in my opinion not fully correct to state it this way.
1) The " infamous exploit" was a misuse where you had to perform some " actions" to get BC in a way you (could have) know that this was not correct, and that you were in violation due to " incorrectly gaining access to the system" in order to get a huge amount of BC. Simply the rule " If you know it isn't correct, mostly it isn't"
2) The seconds system was no violation in any kind. If you keep rerolling and the system gives it to you, and you are doing nothing wrong, can't be expressed as a violation. It is a kind of gambling, and if the " slot machine" gives it to me and I'm doing nothing " unrightful" to get the money / BC, then it can't be described as an " exploit".
And personally, I do think that the AW statement of " we reduced the reroll price", is also a saying something huge:
1) It confirms that AW controls this "gambling system". Thats a major issue in "gambling regulation". For examples roulette tables may not be controlled by the casino to prevent the casino "to make adjustment to the table in order to "let a player lose who has won too much this evening".
2) But also, that the system of rerolling can be adjusted by AW (Questing who raises to me instantly; Is this an overall adjustment inflicting all players, or just the " one they don't like" for example).
3) The system of rerolling is now confirmed that the " gambling in hope that you will get the jackpot" is futile.
And last but not least; saying " So please stop screeching about evil greedy devs" is irrelevant. AW just confirmed that they don't want you to actually make more BC than you spent rerolling. So, if you don't want to be labeled as greedy, then don't state that you find it incorrect that players will make more BC with rerolling, which obviously will cost you money.
Godspeed.